Tuesday, 2010-03-09

[2010/03/09 01:33:14] @ Log started by gepetto
[2010/03/09 01:33:14] @ JJA joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 01:50:13] @ Quit: JJA: Ping timeout: 264 seconds
[2010/03/09 02:52:39] @ JJA joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 02:59:55] @ DavidS joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 09:08:17] @ jmccune joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 09:41:11] @ notbrien joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 10:05:28] @ Quit: fsweetser: Read error: Connection reset by peer
[2010/03/09 10:23:22] @ fsweetser joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 10:48:30] @ Quit: JJA: Ping timeout: 276 seconds
[2010/03/09 11:25:31] @ JJA joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 11:56:10] @ phantez joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 12:06:19] @ DavidS1 joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 12:06:31] @ Quit: DavidS1: Client Quit
[2010/03/09 12:06:39] @ Quit: DavidS: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
[2010/03/09 12:19:53] @ ch joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 12:20:05] <ch> whoever did docs.reductivelabs.com, let me thank you for it!
[2010/03/09 12:29:16] <jbooth> I need to do some custom processing on relationships in a provider I'm working on. What's the 'right' want to retrieve them?
[2010/03/09 12:36:16] <jbooth> I see requires? in the type class but it doesn't appear to ever be used?
[2010/03/09 13:00:34] @ Quit: JJA: Ping timeout: 240 seconds
[2010/03/09 13:11:25] @ lak joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 14:30:04] @ Quit: lak: Quit: lak
[2010/03/09 14:49:19] @ jes5 joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 14:57:54] @ plathrop-away is now known as plathrop
[2010/03/09 15:09:24] @ plathrop is now known as plathrop-away
[2010/03/09 15:39:00] @ stahnma joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 15:58:25] @ plathrop-away is now known as plathrop
[2010/03/09 16:20:10] @ Quit: jmccune: Ping timeout: 264 seconds
[2010/03/09 16:49:19] <jamesturnbull> jbooth: can you expand on what you want?
[2010/03/09 17:19:30] <jbooth> jamesturnbull: @resource.catalog.resources was what I wanted. I think. At least it seems to work.
[2010/03/09 17:31:12] <jamesturnbull> jbooth: ah okay - yeah seems reasonable
[2010/03/09 17:42:27] <jbooth> jamesturnbull: the specific case here is iptables rules ordering. Having puppet do them in order is insufficient should a rule already exist, so I'm extending exists? to include live rule orderings too (where both providers of the require are iptables, of course).
[2010/03/09 17:51:28] <jamesturnbull> jbooth: ah cool - would like to see that code at some point
[2010/03/09 17:52:17] <jbooth> jamesturnbull: It needs a bit more testing and polish. Also the hosts provider. If someone wants ipf they're probably going to have to write it themselves.
[2010/03/09 18:03:03] @ Quit: nasrat: Ping timeout: 256 seconds
[2010/03/09 18:10:26] @ Quit: jamesturnbull: Ping timeout: 248 seconds
[2010/03/09 18:18:09] @ jamesturnbull joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 19:07:39] @ Quit: notbrien: Ping timeout: 256 seconds
[2010/03/09 19:26:59] @ lak joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 19:47:12] @ Quit: lak: Quit: lak
[2010/03/09 20:29:51] @ lak joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 20:42:37] <nigelk> jamesturnbull: is anyone looking at http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/3360 ?
[2010/03/09 20:42:53] <nigelk> i only just remembered it was reported on the list, and it's a huge problem if it is a valid bug?
[2010/03/09 20:49:50] <eric0> hard to know whatthe right thing to do there is. if you have systems legitimately re-imaged would you have to puppetca --revoke manually?
[2010/03/09 20:52:16] <nigelk> yes
[2010/03/09 20:52:23] <nigelk> that's absolutely the right thing to do
[2010/03/09 20:52:39] <nigelk> overwriting existing certs is absolutely the wrong thing to do
[2010/03/09 20:52:53] @ notbrien joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 20:52:54] <nigelk> eric0: or puppetca --clean the old one
[2010/03/09 20:53:08] <nigelk> --revoke isn't such a big deal
[2010/03/09 20:54:22] @ Quit: jes5: Quit: Leaving.
[2010/03/09 20:59:55] <eric0> i guess by 'right' i meant 'least-pain-in-the-ass-for-me' , its odd nobody on #2890 thought the proposal would cause trouble, i guess because it needs to be combined with autosigning
[2010/03/09 20:59:55] <gepetto> eric0: #2890 is http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/2890 "Puppet - Bug #2890: Puppetd: signed certificate retrieval "Retrieved certificate does not match private key" - ReductiveLabs.com"
[2010/03/09 21:11:37] @ Quit: lak: Quit: lak
[2010/03/09 21:13:05] <nigelk> I have to dash, but I'll try to verify this tomorrow morning
[2010/03/09 21:32:14] @ jes5 joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 21:50:38] @ Quit: notbrien: Quit: notbrien
[2010/03/09 22:07:14] @ plathrop is now known as plathrop-away
[2010/03/09 22:39:36] @ Quit: jes5: Quit: Leaving.
[2010/03/09 23:25:14] @ jes5 joined channel #puppet-dev
[2010/03/09 23:44:30] @ nasrat joined channel #puppet-dev

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!