Wednesday, 2009-12-23

[2009/12/23 04:19:59] @ Log started by gepetto_
[2009/12/23 04:19:59] <duritong> jamesturnbull: ping
[2009/12/23 04:21:54] <duritong> jamesturnbull: I missed that #2976 is not really fixed
[2009/12/23 04:23:21] <duritong> jamesturnbull: eh #2967
[2009/12/23 04:23:22] <gepetto_> duritong: jamesturnbull: #2967 is http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/2967 "Puppet - Bug #2967: clients are unable to retrieve file metadata - ReductiveLabs.com"
[2009/12/23 04:23:39] <duritong> jamesturnbull: Fix for #2967 (RFC-1123 problem and regression on wildcarded domains) <- this commit is missing in 0.25.rc2
[2009/12/23 04:23:40] <gepetto_> duritong: jamesturnbull: #2967 is http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/2967 "Puppet - Bug #2967: clients are unable to retrieve file metadata - ReductiveLabs.com"
[2009/12/23 05:17:39] <Volcane> ReinH: sweet, new puppet dash doesnt choke on reports :) looking sweet, few rendering issues on graphs but looking real good
[2009/12/23 05:19:30] <duritong> Volcane: screenshots?
[2009/12/23 05:21:03] <Volcane> would need to sanitize them somehow
[2009/12/23 05:45:59] <ch> ReinH: are there plans to support postgres?
[2009/12/23 05:46:09] <ch> 'cause currently it fails hard with PG ;)
[2009/12/23 05:51:33] <duritong> ch: I would file a bug report
[2009/12/23 05:52:04] <duritong> imho it definately should support any backend that puppet supports, but well I'm not in a position to decide that ;)
[2009/12/23 06:01:53] <Volcane> yeah but come on, this is like brand new code
[2009/12/23 06:01:58] <Volcane> so just make feature/bug requests :)
[2009/12/23 06:06:16] <duritong> jep
[2009/12/23 06:09:13] <ch> yeah
[2009/12/23 06:09:38] <ch> README.markdown just explicitly states "MySQL" so wasn't sure if there were even plans for other DBs ;)
[2009/12/23 07:45:15] <jamesturnbull> duritong: it's def. in the repo
[2009/12/23 07:45:22] <jamesturnbull> duritong: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/repository/revisions/d60ea0e52debf03fddb2336704df10589108fe3a
[2009/12/23 07:46:41] * Volcane wonders what happens after 'info: Sent transaction report in 7.36 seconds' clients just sit there
[2009/12/23 07:46:46] <Volcane> for many seconds
[2009/12/23 07:46:50] <Volcane> guess i need to strace, foo
[2009/12/23 07:46:56] <Volcane> wish ruby had better debugging tools
[2009/12/23 07:48:05] <jamesturnbull> Volcane: ditto
[2009/12/23 07:49:09] <Volcane> i just love when the developers turn off puppet
[2009/12/23 07:49:14] <Volcane> on their vms
[2009/12/23 07:49:26] <Volcane> i can come round and break them spectacularly and laugh about it
[2009/12/23 07:49:32] <jamesturnbull> Volcane: that automation stuff is overrated anyway
[2009/12/23 07:51:46] <Volcane> only the new starters seem to keep it running, i guess i need to ask someone wtf
[2009/12/23 07:51:50] <Volcane> never met any of the devs
[2009/12/23 07:53:44] <duritong> jamesturnbull: it's not this commit
[2009/12/23 07:54:27] <jamesturnbull> duritong: there were three commits in that branch I merged all three
[2009/12/23 07:55:04] <duritong> jamesturnbull: http://github.com/MarkusQ/puppet/commit/b6b33802b801c71fc7d273c172bf55362c58a1a7
[2009/12/23 07:55:10] <jamesturnbull> duritong: hmmm okay looking
[2009/12/23 08:02:30] <jamesturnbull> duritong: it's bizarre I can see the commit in the 0.25.x branhc locally
[2009/12/23 08:03:19] <duritong> weird
[2009/12/23 08:03:46] <duritong> but you agree that it isn't pushed remote as well not on the tar.gz?
[2009/12/23 08:04:37] <jamesturnbull> duritong: yeah but I can't see why not
[2009/12/23 08:04:48] <jamesturnbull> duritong: I'll remerge the branch
[2009/12/23 08:05:46] <jamesturnbull> opinions on whether I should do rc2 or re-release rc1? I lean towards rc2
[2009/12/23 08:06:00] <jamesturnbull> duritong: Volcane ^^
[2009/12/23 08:06:01] <Volcane> rc2
[2009/12/23 08:06:10] <jamesturnbull> yeah
[2009/12/23 08:06:43] <duritong> rc2
[2009/12/23 08:07:17] <duritong> it's strange that only half of the branch got merged and you even have it locally
[2009/12/23 08:08:37] <jamesturnbull> it's bloody weird
[2009/12/23 08:09:02] @ github joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 08:09:02] <github> puppet: Markus Roberts 0.25.x SHA1-e4bb529
[2009/12/23 08:09:02] <github> Fix for #2967 (RFC-1123 problem and regression on wildcarded domains)
[2009/12/23 08:09:03] <gepetto_> github: #2967 is http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/2967 "Puppet - Bug #2967: clients are unable to retrieve file metadata - ReductiveLabs.com"
[2009/12/23 08:09:03] <github> http://bit.ly/4KG1Sc
[2009/12/23 08:09:05] <github> puppet: James Turnbull 0.25.x SHA1-682000b
[2009/12/23 08:09:07] <github> Updated CHANGELOG for 0.25.2rc2
[2009/12/23 08:09:09] <github> http://bit.ly/6cjcay
[2009/12/23 08:09:11] @ github left channel #puppet-dev ()
[2009/12/23 08:10:39] <duritong> jamesturnbull: did you try to diff the local and the upstream branch?
[2009/12/23 08:14:16] <jamesturnbull> duritong: yeah identical
[2009/12/23 08:14:18] <jamesturnbull> now
[2009/12/23 08:20:24] <duritong> wtf
[2009/12/23 08:22:53] @ Quit: ch: kubrick.freenode.net irc.freenode.net
[2009/12/23 08:23:01] <jamesturnbull> yeah it's bizarre but as soon as I remerged and rebased the commit was added
[2009/12/23 08:24:05] @ ch joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 08:24:19] <jamesturnbull> duritong: can you confirm that it's all kosher now?
[2009/12/23 08:24:27] <jamesturnbull> duritong: before I send ANOTHER email :)
[2009/12/23 08:30:23] <duritong> the missing commit is now in the tarball
[2009/12/23 08:30:30] <duritong> so I hope it is fine
[2009/12/23 08:31:09] <duritong> http://pastie.org/754387
[2009/12/23 08:31:47] <jamesturnbull> duritong: a diff between local and origin shows identical
[2009/12/23 08:31:53] <jamesturnbull> duritong: so I am going to assume it's okay
[2009/12/23 08:34:50] <duritong> yeah let's hope so
[2009/12/23 08:37:52] <jamesturnbull> I can't see why it happened either .. my bash history shows me merging that whole branch so I didn't cherry-pick
[2009/12/23 08:37:57] * jamesturnbull is confused
[2009/12/23 08:44:30] <duritong> jamesturnbull: the funny thing is that the missing commit is now on top of the others, so it was missing somehow, but no idea why it happened while merging the branch
[2009/12/23 08:45:18] <jamesturnbull> duritong: but when I git logged the 0.25.x local branch out it popped
[2009/12/23 08:45:26] <jamesturnbull> duritong: before I remerged the branch
[2009/12/23 08:46:47] <duritong> :/
[2009/12/23 08:47:24] <duritong> well all these open source tools they're simple not stable (TM)
[2009/12/23 08:48:10] <jamesturnbull> perhaps ... just thinking now how we're going to avoid this in the future
[2009/12/23 08:48:26] <jamesturnbull> or at least test for such issues
[2009/12/23 08:48:36] <duritong> yep
[2009/12/23 08:56:25] <duritong> I don't know git that good enough to have any ideas
[2009/12/23 09:05:59] <jamesturnbull> duritong: I'll work it out - thanks for the spot and the assist
[2009/12/23 09:07:05] <duritong> np, thanks for your work!
[2009/12/23 10:59:15] @ notbrien joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 12:10:14] * Volcane tries to figure out how to make http://www.devco.net/archives/2009/10/19/reusing_puppet_providers.php work with 0.24
[2009/12/23 12:29:12] @ jes5 joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 12:40:29] <Volcane> ah, subtle change
[2009/12/23 12:40:33] <Volcane> easy
[2009/12/23 12:40:49] <Volcane> plus some extra bits needed if u ever wanted to reuse it without quiting
[2009/12/23 15:24:45] @ Quit: phantez_: "leaving"
[2009/12/23 15:26:54] @ Quit: duritong: Remote closed the connection
[2009/12/23 15:47:01] <ReinH> ch: As soon as I can make the Status SQL portable.
[2009/12/23 15:47:14] <ReinH> Stupid MySQL and it's proprietary SQL
[2009/12/23 15:47:41] <jes5> every SQL has proprietary SQL
[2009/12/23 15:48:10] <ReinH> yes, but MySQL is more equal than others
[2009/12/23 15:53:02] <ch> reinh: well, I have some SQL for models/status.rb which seems to work with PG
[2009/12/23 15:53:14] <ch> but obviously it wont work with mysql ;)
[2009/12/23 16:29:14] @ duritong joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 17:24:18] <ReinH> ch: heh :) thus the portability thing...
[2009/12/23 17:24:30] <ReinH> ch: but I'd be happy to see it
[2009/12/23 17:26:16] @ lak joined channel #puppet-dev
[2009/12/23 17:36:02] <ch> ReinH: http://pastie.org/755091
[2009/12/23 17:36:25] <ch> I think you won't come around heavy IF-ing, with all the time stuff in this query
[2009/12/23 17:49:14] <ReinH> nod
[2009/12/23 17:52:48] <ch> and, all_hashes also doesn't exist ;)
[2009/12/23 17:53:00] @ Quit: notbrien:
[2009/12/23 17:54:57] <ReinH> right
[2009/12/23 17:55:00] <ReinH> we'll figure something out
[2009/12/23 17:55:08] <ReinH> I'd prefer it to be portable
[2009/12/23 17:55:28] <ReinH> although mysql and postgres are probably the only two we'll be able to support if we add sphinx full-text search
[2009/12/23 18:34:01] @ Quit: lak:

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!